You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This looks resolved. Slicing was heavily reworked (advanced-indexing parity in #611, in 0.70.0#628) and is differential-fuzz-gated against NumPy 2.4.2. All the common forms work:
varm=np.arange(24).reshape(2,3,4);Console.WriteLine(string.Join(",",m["1"].shape));// 3,4Console.WriteLine(string.Join(",",m[":, 0"].shape));// 2,4Console.WriteLine(m["..., -1"]);// last index of the trailing axisConsole.WriteLine(m["1, 1:3, ::2"]);// mixed int + range + step
The original repro was a 2019 screenshot on the ndarray-indexing branch. Closing as resolved - please reopen with a minimal repro on 0.70.0 if you still hit it.
Activity
Nucs commentedon Sep 7, 2026
This looks resolved. Slicing was heavily reworked (advanced-indexing parity in #611, in 0.70.0 #628) and is differential-fuzz-gated against NumPy 2.4.2. All the common forms work:
The original repro was a 2019 screenshot on the
ndarray-indexingbranch. Closing as resolved - please reopen with a minimal repro on 0.70.0 if you still hit it.