Repository navigation
chore(security): regenerate the approved publish-workflow revisions - #4803
Conversation
@codex review |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next? Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Readiness at head
|
Read back in production after the merge (2026-10-12 23:34 UTC, merge commit
|
Read back after the merge (merged 2026-10-12 23:34 UTC through the merge queue, production deploy included): the four consumer sources ( |
Why
The cluster only trusts releases signed by publishing-workflow revisions it
has approved. A consumer's deployed release or workflow pin, or the latest
publishing-workflow release candidate, has moved, so the approved list is
out of date.
What
Refresh the approved list and each consumer's matcher from what is deployed
and what each consumer currently pins. Every consumer resolved on both halves,
and each matcher accepts exactly its approved revisions.
No issue: trivial fix.