Skip to content

docs(types): correct misleading comments in Data - #3491

Open
clippytool wants to merge 1 commit into
evstack:mainfrom
clippytool:main
Open

clippytool wants to merge 1 commit into
evstack:mainfrom
clippytool:main

Conversation

@clippytool

@clippytool clippytool commented Oct 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Overview

Correct two comments in types/data.go to match the implementation:

  • Data.LastHeader returns the previous block's data hash.
  • Data.Verify compares the trusted block's data hash with the untrusted block's LastDataHash.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified comments describing previous-block data hashes and verification comparisons.
    • No user-facing behavior or functionality changed.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: e05c62f4-b138-47e1-afc8-3dd41aeef027
📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2b1365 and 5bab190.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1
  • types/data.go

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

This change clarifies comments for Data.LastHeader and Data.Verify. It does not change executable behavior.

Changes: Data comment clarifications

Layer / File(s) Summary
Clarify data hash comments
types/data.go
The LastHeader comment identifies the previous block’s data hash. The Verify comment identifies the trusted block’s data hash and the untrusted block’s last data hash.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: msevey, gupadhyaya

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 5bab1

This documentation-only change is ready to merge.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 5
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the documentation-only change and follows the expected semantic commit style.
Description check Passed The description includes the required Overview section and explains the context and exact comment corrections in types/data.go.
Docstring Coverage Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant