Repository navigation
docs: WO91 — .imp-era PR migration state - #383
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Records the .imp-era PR migration in WO91:
.iscon their branches, all CI checks green. The Dzongkha file was re-derived from the source document because the legacy draft was structurally invalid; the letter table was verified against ROMANIZATION OF DZONGKHA, including the counterintuitive row 23 (a-chung romanized z)..impusing language() selectors; the corpus-correct migration is a split into per-language maps - still to do.Also records the recurring ISC semantics negative (before = lookbehind, after = lookahead) that the Dzongkha conversion hit again.