You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Filing-gate category: ④ in-scope child of #30289 (the scenario-library card schema). It is split out because the ruled scope measured over the 3000-line human-merge threshold: dev report comment 6658595859, seat decision on #30289. Maintainer rulings it carries are on objectstack-ai/cloud#3600: Q1 = v3 (comment 6658194654, 「同意这9个场景」), plus the execution parameter and declarative floor (comment 6658499884).
Scope: one mid-tier scenario card, 客服工单 service desk (service)
Write docs/qa/scenarios/service-desk.json against the schema #30340 lands, plus its own truth-pin test file under packages/qa/scenarios/test/. A test file per card keeps the six card PRs from conflicting.
seed spanning ≥3 months, ≥100 rows on the main object;
declarative preferred (flows, formulas, validation rules over code hooks), so a graduated app can install unmanaged.
Run half:
8–10 read-only 问数 questions: count/sum, group-by, top-N, a time window, ≥2 cross-object, ≥2 permission-boundary (the truth differs per persona), "who owns / latest progress", ≥1 unanswerable-from-seed;
4–6 write operations, each with its expected outcome declared: entry from free text incl. lines, a modify, a workflow step + progress query, a confirm-gated irreversible action, a refused overstep, a refused validation violation, one multi-step chain;
≥3 agent-callable actions declared, ≥1 of them confirm-gated.
Iterate: one sentence, with its expected delta.
Reference:objectstack-ai/templates/packages/helpdesk (domain design only; ⛔ never its v15 code).
⛔ No customer-derived content; ⛔ do not read or paraphrase objectstack-ai/cloud#3567.
Acceptance
The card loads with zero refusals. Every computed truth is asserted in the card's own test file against hand-worked values.
A deliberately wrong truth in a fixture copy goes red.
The PR stays under 3000 changed lines.
Reader: the epic PM of objectstack-ai/cloud#3600 dispatches it once PR #30340 merges. The six siblings are dispatched in parallel.
Re-graded p2 → p1 and handed to the domain:devx lane on a maintainer ruling (Claude Code session 2026-11-05, recorded on objectstack-ai/cloud#3600), verbatim: 「都可以标记高优先级」, then on the seat's follow-up question the option 「p1 + 只交 6 张卡 (推荐)」. pm:epic removed in this stroke; pm:blocked stays on Blocked-by: #30340. When PR #30340 merges, the devx lane seat dispatches this card from pm:queue, overriding this body's "Reader" line. The card's body, and the rulings it cites, are the spec. Note for triage: this is a direct maintainer re-grade; NORTH-STAR's road-table rule yields to the ruling.
Unblocked: Blocked-by: #30340 has merged (58085ffd), so pm:blocked → pm:queue in one transition. This card is the domain:devx lane's to claim and dispatch (p1). The schema it writes against is on main: packages/qa/scenarios/src/schema.ts; worked examples are the three control cards in docs/qa/scenarios/.
Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_016WV4cymvo9YoyLwKCXXBNw
Account: os-elon-musk
Branch: claude/project-thread-9hklro (the card thread's platform-assigned branch; a measured platform exception to claude/issue-<n>-<slug>, runbook 〈卡线程〉) · card thread session session_016WV4d1qKzjKPZvxpJsifYa
Worktree: objectstack-issue-30478
Domain: domain:devx
Seat: domain:devx#1
File surface: docs/qa/scenarios/service_desk.json (new) and one new truth-pin test file packages/qa/scenarios/test/service-desk.test.ts, written against packages/qa/scenarios/src/schema.ts at origin/main and following the control cards and docs/qa/scenarios/travel_expense.json (#30476, PR #30600). ⛔ No edit to test/library.test.ts (README "Adding a card" step 3), schema.ts, loader.ts or truth.ts. No customer-derived content; not objectstack-ai/cloud#3567; objectstack-ai/templates/packages/helpdesk is a domain-design reference only (never its v15 code).
Container & model: p1 · M, mode:thread, model: default tier (dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on the two paths: "no path-derived mandate"), effort: xhigh (p1)
Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card
Thread-read: 6662241335
Premise: holds (Blocked-by: #30340 merged 58085ffd; no docs/qa/scenarios/service_desk.json on origin/mainb3d2f4bd; no open PR or remote branch for this card). Card body's kebab-case file name is corrected by the #30476 landing note 6665997189: a card id is snake_case and equals its file basename.
Serial constraints cleared: siblings #30477#30479#30481 (domain:devx#3) and #30478/#30480 each write their own card file and test file; no open PR touches docs/qa/scenarios/service_desk.json.
Note for this card's author (domain:devx#1), from the epic PM's review of objectstack#30291 / PR #30594 (ruling D). The capability-tag table is closed: a tag with no check is reported unscored, never a pass. It now has 9 rows, listed in packages/qa/scenarios/README.md once PR #30594 merges:
The merged travel-expense card (#30476) declares 12 tags, and 7 of them score unscored: records-forms.formula-field, records-forms.validation-rule, approvals.multi-step-approval, access-security.row-level-security, dashboards.report, ai.ask-data, ai.agent-actions.
Where a tag means the same as a row, use the row's name (e.g. access-security.row-scope, not access-security.row-level-security). Where it genuinely doesn't, keep it: an unscored tag is honest. The epic collects the demand and files one card to add checks for the most-used unscored tags once the six cards land.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: none
Triage: audit · p2 ·
domain:devx· epic child · 2026-11-05T14:09Z⛔ Not a claim.
Blocked-by: #30340holds.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Re-graded p2 → p1 and handed to the
domain:devxlane on a maintainer ruling (Claude Code session 2026-11-05, recorded on objectstack-ai/cloud#3600), verbatim: 「都可以标记高优先级」, then on the seat's follow-up question the option 「p1 + 只交 6 张卡 (推荐)」.pm:epicremoved in this stroke;pm:blockedstays onBlocked-by: #30340. When PR #30340 merges, the devx lane seat dispatches this card frompm:queue, overriding this body's "Reader" line. The card's body, and the rulings it cites, are the spec. Note for triage: this is a direct maintainer re-grade; NORTH-STAR's road-table rule yields to the ruling.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Unblocked:
Blocked-by: #30340has merged (58085ffd), sopm:blocked→pm:queuein one transition. This card is thedomain:devxlane's to claim and dispatch (p1). The schema it writes against is onmain:packages/qa/scenarios/src/schema.ts; worked examples are the three control cards indocs/qa/scenarios/.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:devx#1 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4cymvo9YoyLwKCXXBNw
Claim: PM loop round 1
Session:
session_016WV4cymvo9YoyLwKCXXBNwAccount:
os-elon-muskBranch:
claude/project-thread-9hklro(the card thread's platform-assigned branch; a measured platform exception toclaude/issue-<n>-<slug>, runbook 〈卡线程〉) · card thread sessionsession_016WV4d1qKzjKPZvxpJsifYaWorktree:
objectstack-issue-30478Domain:
domain:devxSeat:
domain:devx#1File surface:
docs/qa/scenarios/service_desk.json(new) and one new truth-pin test filepackages/qa/scenarios/test/service-desk.test.ts, written againstpackages/qa/scenarios/src/schema.tsatorigin/mainand following the control cards anddocs/qa/scenarios/travel_expense.json(#30476, PR #30600). ⛔ No edit totest/library.test.ts(README "Adding a card" step 3),schema.ts,loader.tsortruth.ts. No customer-derived content; not objectstack-ai/cloud#3567;objectstack-ai/templates/packages/helpdeskis a domain-design reference only (never its v15 code).Container & model:
p1 · M,mode:thread,model: default tier(dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstackon the two paths: "no path-derived mandate"),effort: xhigh(p1)Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card
Thread-read: 6662241335
Premise: holds (
Blocked-by: #30340merged58085ffd; nodocs/qa/scenarios/service_desk.jsononorigin/mainb3d2f4bd; no open PR or remote branch for this card). Card body's kebab-case file name is corrected by the #30476 landing note 6665997189: a cardidis snake_case and equals its file basename.Serial constraints cleared: siblings #30477 #30479 #30481 (
domain:devx#3) and #30478/#30480 each write their own card file and test file; no open PR touchesdocs/qa/scenarios/service_desk.json.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:devx#1 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4d1qKzjKPZvxpJsifYa
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 30478, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-9hklro", "pr": 30699, "head": "aa0ceb23b9cc55e39c2d1a774a1a93b402a797f8", "session": "session_016WV4d1qKzjKPZvxpJsifYa", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Added docs/qa/scenarios/service_desk.json, the 客服工单 mid-tier card: 8 objects, 3 row-scoped personas, a support_performance dashboard, 120 tickets July-October 2026 from the $comment rule, 10 questions, 6 operations, 4 agent actions, one iterate step. packages/qa/scenarios/test/service-desk.test.ts pins 10 truths and 11 per-persona truths against hand-worked values, asserts the floor, the seed's SLA/escalation/routing/survey consistency and post-state where-uniqueness, and shows a wrong seed cell or truth spec goes red.", "gates": { "scenarios_test": "pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios exec vitest run --maxWorkers=2 :: exit 0 · Test Files 5 passed (5) · Tests 70 passed (70) · head aa0ceb23b9", "scenarios_typecheck": "pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios typecheck :: exit 0 · head aa0ceb23b9 (closure built)", "loader_refusals": 0, "dispatch_gates_commands": "50 derived · 50 exit 0 · head aa0ceb23b9", "prerequisite_reruns": [ "check-plugin-teardown-shape.mjs --self-test exit 3 -> 0 after git fetch --unshallow origin main", "check:doc-formula-expressions exit 3 -> 0 after a full turbo run build (118/118)", "check:lean-entry-closure exit 3 -> 0 after the same build", "check:dual-build-cjs-loads exit 3 -> 0 after the same build" ], "ran_reconciliation": "50 derived, 50 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN (derived zero: every line carries its exit code)", "merge_origin_main": "merged b77c160a02 (merge commit aa0ceb23b9); touches neither docs/qa nor packages/qa", "ci": "in_progress at report time; completed: Check Changeset success, Governed Surface Queue Guard success, Check Documentation Links success, filter success" }, "line_budget": { "total": 1176, "additions": 1176, "deletions": 0, "files": 2, "threshold": 3000 }, "files_changed": [ "docs/qa/scenarios/service_desk.json", "packages/qa/scenarios/test/service-desk.test.ts" ], "changeset": "none: @objectstack/scenarios is private; skip-changeset sent with pr_create and read back on the PR", "floor": { "objects_5_to_8": "expect.objects (8)", "automation_flow": "escalation_rule (2 active, 1 inactive) seeded + escalated tickets in grp_tier2; survey-on-resolve in run.operations[2]; capabilities automation.record-triggered-flow, automation.time-relative-trigger", "roles_with_row_scope": "run.personas[0..2] all scoped: support_agent (assignee a02), team_lead (group grp_tech), portal_customer (customer cus_03 + public comments)", "report_or_dashboard": "expect.dashboards[0] support_performance (+ appNavTargets[3])", "seed_span_and_size": "run.seed.ticket: 120 rows, opened_on 2026-07..2026-10 (4 months)", "declarative_preferred": "prompt.detailed zh/en + capabilities (formula-field, validation-rule, record-triggered-flow, time-relative-trigger); no schema field grades it", "questions_8_to_10": "run.questions (10)", "operations_4_to_6": "run.operations (6)", "agent_actions_3_plus_1_confirm": "run.agentActions (4); run.agentActions[3] close_ticket confirm true", "iterate": "iterate.change + expectDelta (objects kb_article; lookups ticket.kb_article)" }, "run_half": { "question_kinds": { "count_sum": [ "run.questions[0] open_tickets (count)", "run.questions[6] minutes_by_group (sum)", "run.questions[8] contract_value_by_tier (sum)" ], "group_by": [ "run.questions[1] tickets_by_status", "run.questions[4] breaches_by_customer_tier", "run.questions[5] csat_by_group (avg)", "run.questions[6] minutes_by_group" ], "top_n": [ "run.questions[2] top_customers" ], "time_window": [ "run.questions[3] urgent_high_last_30_days (last_days 30)" ], "cross_object": [ "run.questions[4] (customer.tier)", "run.questions[5] (ticket.group)", "run.questions[6] (ticket.group)", "run.questions[7] (assignee.name)" ], "permission_boundary": [ "run.questions[0] (3 personas)", "run.questions[1] (team_lead)", "run.questions[5] (support_agent, portal_customer)", "run.questions[6] (team_lead, portal_customer withheld)", "run.questions[8] (support_agent and portal_customer withheld, team_lead)" ], "who_owns_latest_progress": [ "run.questions[7] tk_0108_owner" ], "unanswerable": [ "run.questions[9] avg_first_response_hours" ] }, "operation_kinds": { "entry_from_free_text_incl_lines": "run.operations[0] log_ticket_from_call (applied: ticket + 2 comment lines)", "modify": "run.operations[1] reassign_ticket (applied)", "workflow_step": "run.operations[2] reply_then_resolve (applied: resolution sends the survey; progress query run.questions[7])", "confirm_gated_irreversible": "run.operations[3] close_ticket (pending_confirmation)", "refused_overstep": "run.operations[4] agent_edits_rating (refused PERMISSION_DENIED)", "refused_validation": "run.operations[5] resolve_without_code (refused VALIDATION_FAILED)", "multi_step_chain": "run.operations[2] reply_then_resolve (reply, resolve, survey); run.operations[0] also chains ticket + two comments" }, "personas": 3, "guardrails": 5, "agent_actions": 4 }, "truths_pinned": { "all_rows": 10, "per_persona": 11, "file": "packages/qa/scenarios/test/service-desk.test.ts" }, "wrong_truth_red": [ "fixture copy, seed sr_029.score +1: assertPinned throws; csat_by_group grp_billing 85/18", "fixture copy, open_tickets filter value ['new','open']: assertPinned throws; open_tickets 12, team_lead 7" ], "deviations": [ "branch is the platform-assigned claude/project-thread-9hklro, not the Claim's claude/issue-30478-service-desk-card; the seat was told before the first push so it can amend the Claim's Branch line", "file name service_desk.json, not the body's service-desk.json (snake_case id = basename, landing note 6665997189)", "PR carries no assignee and no review request (os-dev rule 2; the session context's assign/review ask is left to the seat at hand-over, and the order forbids MCP writes)", "PR body footer is the AGENTS.md session-URL form, not the harness's line", "sla_breached is null on unresolved tickets (breach judged at resolution), so the 3 open escalated tickets are not counted in breaches_by_customer_tier", "objectstack-ai/templates is outside this session's repo scope: domain designed from the card text", "seed generated by a scratch script kept out of the PR; its rule is in the card's $comment", "the worker restarted during the first gate pass (stopped at 46/50); every gate was re-run on the final head" ], "mcp_calls": "6 — reads only: issue_read get #30478, issue_read get_comments #30478, issue_read get_comments #30476, issue_read get_labels #30699 (failed: not an issue), pull_request_read get_check_runs #30699, pull_request_read get #30699", "api_writes": { "count": 2, "endpoints": [ "relay pr_create: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls + POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/30699/labels (run 42123399274, read-back identical 6618 bytes)", "post-stamped: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/30478/comments (this comment)" ] }, "security_findings": "none", "out_of_scope_findings": [ "carrier: seat · noted, not filed · the schema gaps the travel_expense report named still hold: no expect key for a flow or automation, nor for a report distinct from a dashboard" ] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Note for this card's author (
domain:devx#1), from the epic PM's review of objectstack#30291 / PR #30594 (ruling D). The capability-tag table is closed: a tag with no check is reportedunscored, never a pass. It now has 9 rows, listed inpackages/qa/scenarios/README.mdonce PR #30594 merges:records-forms.lookup,records-forms.master-detail-inline-edit,records-forms.roll-up-summary,records-forms.select-options,access-security.field-permissions,access-security.row-scope,approvals.approval-flow,automation.record-triggered-flow,dashboards.widget-measures.The merged travel-expense card (#30476) declares 12 tags, and 7 of them score
unscored:records-forms.formula-field,records-forms.validation-rule,approvals.multi-step-approval,access-security.row-level-security,dashboards.report,ai.ask-data,ai.agent-actions.Where a tag means the same as a row, use the row's name (e.g.
access-security.row-scope, notaccess-security.row-level-security). Where it genuinely doesn't, keep it: anunscoredtag is honest. The epic collects the demand and files one card to add checks for the most-used unscored tags once the six cards land.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:devx#1 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4cymvo9YoyLwKCXXBNw
Landed · PR #30699 merged as
bfb6e15238· 2026-11-05T23:28Z. The card closed throughFixes, and this stroke removespm:dispatched. ACCEPT 6671799724.