Repository navigation
Description
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Filing-gate category: ④ in-scope child of #30289 (the scenario-library card schema). It is split out because the ruled scope measured over the 3000-line human-merge threshold: dev report comment 6658595859, seat decision on #30289. Maintainer rulings it carries are on objectstack-ai/cloud#3600: Q1 = v3 (comment 6658194654, 「同意这9个场景」), plus the execution parameter and declarative floor (comment 6658499884).
Blocked-by: #30340
Scope: one mid-tier scenario card, 采购申请到收货 requisition-to-receipt (procurement)
Write docs/qa/scenarios/requisition-to-receipt.json against the schema #30340 lands, plus its own truth-pin test file under packages/qa/scenarios/test/. A test file per card keeps the six card PRs from conflicting.
- Domain: requisition, purchase order + lines, goods receipt, supplier; an amount-threshold multi-level approval.
- Mid-tier floor:
- 5–8 related objects;
- ≥1 approval or automation flow;
- 2–3 roles with row scope;
- ≥1 report or dashboard;
- seed spanning ≥3 months, ≥100 rows on the main object;
- declarative preferred (flows, formulas, validation rules over code hooks), so a graduated app can install unmanaged.
- Run half:
- 8–10 read-only 问数 questions: count/sum, group-by, top-N, a time window, ≥2 cross-object, ≥2 permission-boundary (the truth differs per persona), "who owns / latest progress", ≥1 unanswerable-from-seed;
- 4–6 write operations, each with its expected outcome declared: entry from free text incl. lines, a modify, a workflow step + progress query, a confirm-gated irreversible action, a refused overstep, a refused validation violation, one multi-step chain;
- ≥3 agent-callable actions declared, ≥1 of them confirm-gated.
- Iterate: one sentence, with its expected delta.
- Reference:
objectstack-ai/templates/packages/procurement(domain design only; ⛔ never its v15 code). - ⛔ No customer-derived content; ⛔ do not read or paraphrase objectstack-ai/cloud#3567.
Acceptance
- The card loads with zero refusals. Every computed truth is asserted in the card's own test file against hand-worked values.
- A deliberately wrong truth in a fixture copy goes red.
- The PR stays under 3000 changed lines.
Reader: the epic PM of objectstack-ai/cloud#3600 dispatches it once PR #30340 merges. The six siblings are dispatched in parallel.
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: none
Triage: audit · p2 ·
domain:devx· epic child · 2026-11-05T14:12Z⛔ Not a claim.
Blocked-by: #30340holds.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Re-graded p2 → p1 and handed to the
domain:devxlane on a maintainer ruling (Claude Code session 2026-11-05, recorded on objectstack-ai/cloud#3600), verbatim: 「都可以标记高优先级」, then on the seat's follow-up question the option 「p1 + 只交 6 张卡 (推荐)」.pm:epicremoved in this stroke;pm:blockedstays onBlocked-by: #30340. When PR #30340 merges, the devx lane seat dispatches this card frompm:queue, overriding this body's "Reader" line. The card's body, and the rulings it cites, are the spec. Note for triage: this is a direct maintainer re-grade; NORTH-STAR's road-table rule yields to the ruling.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Unblocked:
Blocked-by: #30340has merged (58085ffd), sopm:blocked→pm:queuein one transition. This card is thedomain:devxlane's to claim and dispatch (p1). The schema it writes against is onmain:packages/qa/scenarios/src/schema.ts; worked examples are the three control cards indocs/qa/scenarios/.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:devx#1 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4cymvo9YoyLwKCXXBNw
Claim: PM loop round 1
Session:
session_016WV4cymvo9YoyLwKCXXBNwAccount:
os-elon-muskBranch:
claude/project-thread-rk7oyk(the card thread's platform-assigned branch; a measured platform exception toclaude/issue-<n>-<slug>, runbook 〈卡线程〉) · card thread sessionsession_016WV4cwyCQLVbmVSgGXVBhcWorktree:
objectstack-issue-30480Domain:
domain:devxSeat:
domain:devx#1File surface:
docs/qa/scenarios/requisition_to_receipt.json(new) and one new truth-pin test filepackages/qa/scenarios/test/requisition-to-receipt.test.ts, written againstpackages/qa/scenarios/src/schema.tsatorigin/mainand following the control cards anddocs/qa/scenarios/travel_expense.json(#30476, PR #30600). ⛔ No edit totest/library.test.ts(README "Adding a card" step 3),schema.ts,loader.tsortruth.ts. No customer-derived content; not objectstack-ai/cloud#3567;objectstack-ai/templates/packages/procurementis a domain-design reference only (never its v15 code).Container & model:
p1 · M,mode:thread,model: default tier(dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstackon the two paths: "no path-derived mandate"),effort: xhigh(p1)Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card
Thread-read: 6662265484
Premise: holds (
Blocked-by: #30340merged58085ffd; nodocs/qa/scenarios/requisition_to_receipt.jsononorigin/mainb3d2f4bd; no open PR or remote branch for this card). Card body's kebab-case file name is corrected by the #30476 landing note 6665997189: a cardidis snake_case and equals its file basename.Serial constraints cleared: siblings #30477 #30479 #30481 (
domain:devx#3) and #30478/#30480 each write their own card file and test file; no open PR touchesdocs/qa/scenarios/requisition_to_receipt.json.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:devx#1 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4cwyCQLVbmVSgGXVBhc
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 30480, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-rk7oyk", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/30703", "head": "1590b31fb678c530102ec293c3bb7825aa945f81", "session": "session_016WV4cwyCQLVbmVSgGXVBhc", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Adds the 采购申请到收货 requisition-to-receipt mid-tier card (8 objects; a 1 / 2 / 3-level approval set by amount at 5,000 and 30,000; personas requester and dept_manager row-scoped, buyer org-wide; 120 requisitions July-October 2026; 10 questions, 6 operations, 5 agent actions) and its own truth-pin test. Every truth was worked by hand from the $comment rule and the loader matched all 10 + 6 pins on the first run. No schema, loader, truth or library.test.ts edit.", "tests": "pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios test :: exit 0 · Test Files 5 passed (5) · Tests 69 passed (69) (head 1590b31fb6, after the main merge); pnpm --filter @objectstack/scenarios typecheck :: exit 0 (after pnpm --filter '@objectstack/scenarios^...' build); tsc --listFiles includes test/requisition-to-receipt.test.ts; eslint --no-inline-config on the new test file :: exit 0. Ablation: n/a, no runtime behaviour changed; the red direction is held by the two fixture-copy tests (wrong seed cell r062 +1 moves approved_spend to 1418401, requested_last_month to 493201 and both personas; top_suppliers filter ['received'] differs).", "gates": { "dispatch_gates_commands": "50 derived on head 1590b31fb6 · 50 exit 0", "ran_reconciliation": "50 derived, 50 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN (derived zero: every line carries its exit code)", "first_sweep_on_3d37abf976": [ "check-plugin-teardown-shape --self-test exit 3: shallow clone, pinned fixture unreachable; cleared by git fetch --unshallow origin main", "check:doc-formula-expressions exit 3, check:dual-build-cjs-loads exit 3: dist not built; cleared by a whole-tree turbo run build (119/119)", "check:dts-closure exit 1: ran while my objectql closure build was rebuilding @objectstack/metadata; exit 0 with no build running" ], "merge_origin_main": "merged b77c160a02 before pr_create (plain merge commit 1590b31fb6, clean); delta vs main still the 2 new files", "commit_trailers": "node scripts/check-commit-card-trailers.mjs --range origin/main..HEAD :: exit 0", "ci": "in_progress at report time; already success: Check Changeset, Check PR Size, Governed Surface Queue Guard, PR-body guards, Check Documentation Links, Test UI; UI build/type/lint lanes skipped by path filter" }, "line_budget": { "total": 1332, "additions": 1332, "deletions": 0, "files": 2, "threshold": 3000, "verdict": "under" }, "files_changed": [ "docs/qa/scenarios/requisition_to_receipt.json", "packages/qa/scenarios/test/requisition-to-receipt.test.ts" ], "changeset": "none: @objectstack/scenarios is private; skip-changeset label sent with pr_create and read back on the PR", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "floor": { "objects_5_to_8": "expect.objects (8)", "approval_flow": "run.seed.approval_step (levels 1, 2, 3) + expect.objects[4] + capabilities approvals.multi-step-approval, approvals.dynamic-approver-routing + run.operations[2]", "roles_with_row_scope": "run.personas[0] requester (e02) and run.personas[1] dept_manager (Sales, e13) scope all five transactional objects; run.personas[2] buyer is org-wide", "report_or_dashboard": "expect.dashboards[0] purchasing_spend_by_department (+ appNavTargets)", "seed_span_and_size": "run.seed.purchase_requisition: 120 rows, request_date 2026-07..2026-10", "declarative_preferred": "prompt.detailed zh/en + capabilities (formula-field, roll-up-summary, validation-rule, record-triggered-flow); no schema field grades it", "questions_8_to_10": "run.questions (10)", "operations_4_to_6": "run.operations (6)", "agent_actions_3_plus_1_confirm": "run.agentActions (5); cancel_purchase_order confirm true", "iterate": "supplier invoices with a three-way match: objects supplier_invoice; lookups supplier_invoice.purchase_order, supplier_invoice.supplier" }, "run_half": { "count_sum": [ "approved_spend (sum)", "requisitions_by_status (count)" ], "group_by": [ "requisitions_by_status", "requisitions_by_approval_levels", "ordered_by_department", "department_budgets" ], "top_n": [ "top_suppliers" ], "time_window": [ "requested_last_month (calendar previous_month)" ], "cross_object": [ "ordered_by_department (purchase_order.requisition.requester.department)", "laptops_received (po_line.item)" ], "permission_boundary": [ "approved_spend (requester, dept_manager)", "requisitions_by_status (dept_manager)", "department_budgets (requester withheld, dept_manager, buyer withheld)" ], "who_owns_latest_progress": [ "pr_0111_waiting_on" ], "unanswerable": [ "laptops_in_stock" ], "operation_kinds": { "entry_from_free_text_incl_lines": "raise_po_from_text (applied)", "modify": "fix_chair_quantity (applied)", "workflow_step_plus_progress_query": "manager_approves_level_one (applied; ask includes the progress query; pr_0111_waiting_on is the pre-step answer)", "confirm_gated_irreversible": "cancel_sent_po (pending_confirmation)", "refused_overstep": "manager_approves_finance_level (refused PERMISSION_DENIED)", "refused_validation": "receive_more_than_ordered (refused VALIDATION_FAILED)", "multi_step_chain": "raise_po_from_text (order, two lines, send, requisition to ordered)" }, "truths_pinned": { "all_rows": 10, "per_persona": 6 } }, "deviations": [ "file name requisition_to_receipt.json, not the card body's requisition-to-receipt.json: id must be snake_case and equal the basename (landing note 6665997189); schema unchanged", "7 named operation kinds over the 6-operation cap: raise_po_from_text carries entry-from-free-text and the multi-step chain", "schema cannot express an approval flow, 'declarative preferred' or a report distinct from a dashboard as graded structure; stated in prompt + capabilities, as on travel_expense", "objectstack-ai/templates is outside this session's repository scope: domain designed from the card text alone", "seed generated by a scratch script kept out of the PR; its rule is the card's $comment; truths hand-derived (derivations beside the pins) and cross-checked by an independent count", "git fetch --unshallow origin main deepened the shared clone (one .git for every worktree) to reach a pinned self-test fixture", "the whole-tree turbo build held the shared verify lock 923 s (15m23s); the lock flags that as a possible holder-side finding, read here as the normal cost of that one command", "no subscribe_pr_activity, no PR assignee and no review request: os-dev.md rule 2 and its dispatch-contract-over-platform-posture clause; the seat sets those at hand-over", "the harness attribution reminder names the model in its Co-Authored-By line; commits carry the model-free pair per AGENTS.md (trailer checker exit 0)" ], "mcp_calls": "8 — all reads: issue_read get #30480, issue_read get_comments #30480 (x2), pull_request_read get #30600, issue_read get_comments #30476, issue_read get_labels #30703 (failed: a PR is not an issue there), pull_request_read get #30703, pull_request_read get_check_runs #30703; 0 write tools", "api_writes": { "count": 2, "endpoints": [ "relay pr_create (run 42124010149): POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls + POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/30703/labels", "post-stamped: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/30480/comments (this comment)" ], "git_push": 2 }, "open_questions": [], "security_findings": "none", "out_of_scope_findings": [] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
epic:#3600#1 · hotlong · session_01Q4EjjPXwX1YfHyKJUh4agu
Note for this card's author (
domain:devx#1), from the epic PM's review of objectstack#30291 / PR #30594 (ruling D). The capability-tag table is closed: a tag with no check is reportedunscored, never a pass. It now has 9 rows, listed inpackages/qa/scenarios/README.mdonce PR #30594 merges:records-forms.lookup,records-forms.master-detail-inline-edit,records-forms.roll-up-summary,records-forms.select-options,access-security.field-permissions,access-security.row-scope,approvals.approval-flow,automation.record-triggered-flow,dashboards.widget-measures.The merged travel-expense card (#30476) declares 12 tags, and 7 of them score
unscored:records-forms.formula-field,records-forms.validation-rule,approvals.multi-step-approval,access-security.row-level-security,dashboards.report,ai.ask-data,ai.agent-actions.Where a tag means the same as a row, use the row's name (e.g.
access-security.row-scope, notaccess-security.row-level-security). Where it genuinely doesn't, keep it: anunscoredtag is honest. The epic collects the demand and files one card to add checks for the most-used unscored tags once the six cards land.