Repository navigation
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Superseded by consolidated postal geocoding PR #124. This PR's head commit is retained in the combined branch. Combined CI passes on Node.js 24/26 and static checks.
Summary
Add approximate LTU postal locations for delivery-to-return distance analysis.
GeoNames LT.zip retrieved 2026-11-04 (export dated 2026-11-04), CC BY 4.0. Its 21,870 source rows produce 2,023 unique five-digit records. Average distinct coordinate pairs per code; repeated rows have no extra weight. These are representative points, not postal centroids. Coverage is partial and rural estimates can have substantial error. The upstream observation date is unknown. Source, attribution, checksums, UPU urban/rural/missing-code checks, and rebuild steps are in
docs/geocode-LTU.md.Evidence
After: country-focused offline tests execute urban leading-zero and rural lookups, accepted formats, unknown/absent codes, coordinate validity, deterministic deduplication, and invalid-source rejection.
npm test: 99 passed.npm run lint,npm run format:check,npm run validate:data: passed. Validation retains two existing AUT/BEL warnings.git diff --cached --checkpassed.Merge Danger
Door: two-way
Revert this country addition to remove support. No merge, deployment or publication is part of this PR.
Blast Radius: LTU
Other country behavior, exports and types are unchanged.
lib/geocode.jsoverlaps with concurrent country additions and can require conflict resolution. Source coverage and location accuracy are limited; missing codes stay undefined. The existing dependency install reports six moderate and one high audit finding; dependency changes are outside this country scope.