Repository navigation
Fixes for rotational periodic boundaries: implicit solver, multigrid and limiters #2961
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rois1995
wants to merge
12
commits into
su2code:develop
Choose a base branch
from
rois1995:fix_periodic_rotation
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+583
−31
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2990df4
Rotate the columns of the Jacobian block at rotational periodic bound…
ce585c7
Rotate the periodic solution on all multigrid levels
c39428c
Compute the limiters of rotational periodic points with the complete …
3f9ac2a
Refresh Jones restart references from periodic CI
9de9fd0
Avoid shadowing periodic communication loop indices
c5ebebe
Address rotational periodic limiter review feedback
609f0c2
Exercise Aachen turbine multigrid in serial and MPI regressions
639317d
Preserve limiter displacement reuse and AD math dispatch
492d2eb
Use Aachen multigrid references from serial and MPI CI
6280ff1
Refresh parallel AD stator reference after limiter refactor
ef373c9
Merge develop f110e914b5 to align Aachen comparison and include SA wa…
12d95ac
Document exact periodic angle checks and simplify bound copies
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you shouldn't do direct comparisons on floats, use tolerances instead:
abs(angles[0]) < EPS
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this check, the angles come directly from the configuration: configured zero remains exactly zero after degree-to-radian conversion and donor negation. Keeping the exact comparison retains every nonzero rotation, including very small angles. I documented this in 12d95ac and added tests for signed zero and tiny positive/negative angles on all three axes. The focused tests pass.